1. Introduction In the ongoing struggle to faithfully articulate the heart of the Christian gospel, evangelical churches today face recurring challenges from theological systems that risk distorting the message of salvation by grace through faith. One significant movement in this arena is “Free Grace Theology” (FGT),[1] which, in its quest to protect the doctrine of sola fide ("faith alone"), has redefined saving faith as a mere act of intellectual assent, separated from repentance, obedience, and transformation. While FGT affirms that salvation is exclusively the gift of God, received through faith apart from any works, it interprets biblical faith in such a narrow manner that it routinely severs justification from sanctification, and assurance from perseverance in the Christian life. This paper seeks to offer a comprehensive historical, biblical, and pastoral critique of FGT. With a spirit of charitable concern, and a commitment to the clarity and fullness of the gospel, the following analysis argues that the witness of Scripture and the testimony of historic Christianity both affirm that authentic faith in Christ is inseparably linked to repentance, transformation, and obedience—in other words, that while faith alone justifies, justifying faith is never alone. This paper will examine FGT in terms of its definition, development, theological claims, exegetical arguments, and practical consequences, seeking to uphold the historic Protestant and biblical account of salvation which, far from undermining grace, vindicates it by showing that grace not only pardons but also transforms. As this paper will argue, FGT is a departure from an orthodox view of salvation, however this does not mean that those who hold this view, and are repenting of sin and hoping in Christ are not saved. There are many faithful Christians who hold this view and we should treat them as brothers and sisters in Christ. However, this in no way validates FGT. It does however call us to engage and discuss these issues with Christian charity. For if you have all knowledge and all faith but have not love, you are nothing (1 Cor 13:2). 2. Historical Context 2.1. The Development of Lordship Salvation The Lordship Salvation movement emphasizes that saving faith in Christ is never abstract or merely intellectual but involves submission to Christ as Lord resulting in repentance from sin. Though the term “Lordship Salvation” gained widespread attention in the 1980s, the concept itself is deeply rooted in historic theology. Even in the earliest centuries of the church, leaders connected faith and repentance inseparably. Clement of Rome (c. 35 – c. 99 AD) wrote: Let us attend to what is good, pleasing, and acceptable in the sight of Him who formed us. Let us look steadfastly to the blood of Christ, and see how precious that blood is to God which, having been shed for our salvation, has set the grace of repentance before the whole world… from generation to generation, the Lord has granted a place of repentance to all such as would be converted unto Him.[2] Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35 – c. 108 AD) called believers to repent and turn to a true faith in Christ’s passion, implying that without repentance, faith is not genuine.[3] Justin Martyr (c. 100 – c. 165 AD) stated, “Those who are found not living as he taught should know that they are not really Christians, even if his teachings are on their lips, for he said that not those who merely profess but those who also do the works will be saved.”[4] Tertullian (c. 155 – c. 240 AD) likewise saw repentance as integral to forgiveness, “we confess our sins to the Lord… of confession repentance is born; by repentance God is appeased.”[5] Gregory the Great (c. 540-604 AD) wrote, “For whosoever mourns past transgressions, yet forsakes them not ... subjects himself to the penalty of more grievous sin They cleanse themselves in vain by their weeping, if they wickedly defile themselves in their living.”[6] The Reformers consistently taught that genuine faith produces repentance and obedience as evidence of salvation. Martin Luther’s comments in his Galatians commentary yield insight. Galatians 5:6 reads, “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.” Luther points out that a true faith is a working faith. He wrote, “[H]e that will be a true Christian, must be a true believer. Now he believeth not truly, if works and charity [love] follow not faith….”[7] Similarly, confessional documents such as the Westminster Confession of Faith affirm that faith always involves a turning from sin: “Faith, thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification: yet it is not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is never without hope, love, and repentance.”[8] The London Baptist Confession of 1689 states, “These good works, done in obedience to God’s commandments, are the fruit and evidence of a true and living faith.”[9] Even the Arminian founder of the Methodist Church, John Wesley said, “We are justified without the works of the law, as any previous condition of justification; but they are an immediate fruit of that faith whereby we are justified. So that if good works do not follow our faith, even all inward and outward holiness, it is plain our faith is nothing worth; we are yet in our sins.”[10] Billy Graham put it this way, “Only as we bow in contrition, confession, and repentance at the foot of the Cross, can we find forgiveness.”[11] Historically, this understanding formed the consensus of orthodox Christianity: true faith is inseparable from repentance which results in life transformation. 2.2. The Emergence of Free Grace Theology FGT, by contrast, is a late twentieth-century development. The Grace Evangelical Society (GES), founded in 1986 by Robert Wilkin, and prominent figures such as Zane Hodges, sought to counter what they perceived as a legalistic distortion in Lordship Salvation.[12] Hodges and his colleagues argued that the gospel guarantees eternal life to anyone who believes, regardless of repentance, discipleship, or obedience. Key works like The Gospel Under Siege (1981) and Absolutely Free! (1989) explicitly articulate this position. FGT is therefore reactive in nature: it was formulated as a response to the Lordship Salvation emphasis popularized by John MacArthur’s The Gospel According to Jesus (1988) and other evangelical leaders who stressed the inseparability of faith and obedience.[13] FGT claims its view shows the “freeness of grace,” but it redefines that freeness in a way that deviates from historic orthodoxy, reducing it to intellectual assent, by removing repentance from it. The name “Free Grace Theology” is a name that its proponents came up with for themselves. One should not read the phrase free grace in the title and assume that other understandings of salvation are importing a merited grace idea. Free grace is what they see themselves as defending, however this paper will make clear that FGT fails to live up to its namesake. 2.3. Distinguishing FGT from Historic Orthodoxy It is important to recognize that FGT does not reject the freeness of God’s grace; rather, it reinterprets grace. Historic Christian theology affirms that salvation is a free gift of God, not merited by works (Eph. 2:8–9).[14] Yet, that grace is never inactive. Genuine grace inevitably produces repentance, good works, and obedience to God’s commands. The novelty of FGT lies not in its affirmation of free grace but in its separation of grace from repentance and the ongoing transformation of the believer’s life—a separation unsupported by Scripture and historic confessions. 3. Biblical Evidence for the Inseparability of Faith and Repentance 3.1. The Gospel Call Mark 1:15 “and saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.’” (Mark 1:15) Jesus inaugurated his public ministry with a concise yet profound proclamation, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15).[15] This verse immediately links repentance with faith as the response to the gospel. The command to “repent and believe” is not sequential in a purely chronological sense but relational and conceptual: true belief necessarily entails turning from sin and turning toward God. Jesus’ use of both terms together indicates that faith cannot exist in isolation; it is a holistic orientation of the heart and life toward God. The Greek word metanoia means to “feel remorse, repent, be converted.”[16] It is a reorientation of life. When combined with faith, it emphasizes that genuine trust in God produces an active rejection of sin and a life turned toward obedience. In other words, repentance is not an optional add-on to faith; it is an intrinsic aspect of faith in Christ. 3.2. Apostolic Teaching 3.2.1. Acts 14:15 “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men, of like nature with you, and we bring you good news, that you should turn from these vain things to a living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them.” (Acts 14:15) In Lystra, Paul declares the gospel as a call to turn “from these vain things” to “a living God.” While the word “repentance” is not explicitly used, the concept is embedded in the language of turning. Here repentance is a transfer of trust—from dead idols to the living Creator. This illustrates why repentance and faith are inseparable: to repent is to redirect trust from one object to another. In biblical terms, repentance is faith forsaking one object and embracing another. 3.2.2. Acts 20:21 “testifying both to Jews and to Greeks of repentance toward God and of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.” (Acts 20:21) The Apostle Paul summarizes his evangelistic mission as “…testifying both to Jews and Greeks of repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 20:21) Paul explicitly pairs repentance with faith, framing them as complementary responses to the gospel. The Greek construction of this phrase demonstrates that repentance is directed toward God and faith is directed toward Christ. This dual focus indicates the holistic nature of conversion: one turns from sin to God while simultaneously trusting in Christ for salvation. This pairing is elsewhere in the New Testament, particularly in the preaching of Peter (Acts 2:38) and John the Baptist (Matt 3:2), consistently presenting repentance and faith as inseparable dimensions of a biblical response to God’s call. 3.2.3. Acts 26:20 “but declared first to those in Damascus, then in Jerusalem and throughout all the region of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds in keeping with their repentance.” (Acts 26:20) As the gospel call was given both to Jews and Gentiles, everyone is called to repent and turn to God. To turn away from one thing is to turn to another. The act of repentance is also the act of turning to God. Both of these can be encapsulated in the concept of genuine faith. The text does not communicate repentance and turning to God as two separate and distinct things. This is clear in how the verse ends by reemphasizing genuine repentance. He is not speaking about repentance then turning to God as a separate concept, then returning again to repentance. There is more continuity in the argument than that. He is speaking of one thing which is a turning from sin which is (in the same act) a turning to God. One cannot turn to God if he is not simultaneously turning from sin. 3.3. Faith Manifested in Works 3.3.1. Matthew 7:17-20 “So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.” (Matt 7:17-20) Jesus is speaking about false prophets in this passage, but he speaks about a general reality. We produce what we are. If a person has faith in Christ, meaning the Spirit of God dwells in him and he is a new creation, having a new heart (Rom 8:9; 2 Cor 5:17; Ezek 36:26), then he will bear fruit that is consistent with this new nature. Therefore, according to Jesus, it is not unreasonable to look at a person’s fruit/works for insight into whether that person is a genuine Christian. Some arguing against this would suggest that this expects perfect obedience. But the Scriptures are clear that we stumble in many ways (Jas 3:2). Our whole lives are lives of repentance and sanctification. 3.3.2. James 2:14–26 James 2:14–26 famously addresses the relationship between faith and works, “So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead” (Jas 2:17). James does not deny justification by faith; rather, he emphasizes that true faith inevitably produces good works (life change). Saving faith is never inactive—it manifests itself in obedience, love, and action. The rhetorical argument of James, “Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered his son Isaac?” (2:21), illustrates that faith and obedience are intimately linked. Abraham’s willingness to act was the evidence of his saving faith. 3.4. Grace Is not in Vain: 1 Corinthians 15:9–10 “For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me.” (1 Cor 15:9–10) After defining the gospel and affirming its supremacy to the Corinthians (1 Cor 15:1–8), Paul turns to his own experience as living proof of its power. Once a persecutor of the church, he confesses, “his grace toward me was not in vain.” (1 Cor 15:10). If God’s grace had left Paul unchanged, it would have been empty and ineffective. Instead, that grace transformed him and energized his labor. In other words, saving grace is never without effect—it always produces change. 3.5. A Grace that Works: Ephesians 2:8–10 “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” (Eph 2:8–10) The Apostle Paul leaves no doubt that salvation is by grace. Yet Ephesians 2:8–10 gives the full picture. We are not saved by works, but by grace through a faith that works. We are not saved by works but for works. The conjunction “for” in verse 10 grounds the statement of verses 8–9: works do not save, rather that salvation itself creates us anew resulting in good works. Works are not the cause of salvation but its inevitable result. The same grace that saves also works within us to produce what pleases God. 3.6. Professing and Believing Are not the Same Thing 3.6.1. Titus 1:16 “They profess to know God, but they deny him by their works. They are detestable, disobedient, unfit for any good work.” (Tit 1:16) Titus is being warned that a profession of faith is only as good as the works that prove that profession. The belief that a person can be in Christ, professing to know God, but not having repented of his sins is categorically denied by the Apostle Paul. A true faith gives evidence of its existence. 3.6.2. James 2:19-20 “You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder! Do you want to be shown, you foolish person, that faith apart from works is useless?” (Jas 2:19–20) Believing can have more than one meaning. A belief that merely acknowledges the truth of something is no different than the type of belief that demons have, and even the demons shudder! That is to say, they tremble before God. The point James is making in this text is that this kind of faith is of no value. Genuine faith brings with it evidence of that faith. He is not saying that we are saved by works, rather that works are the necessary result of faith. A true faith is a repenting faith. 3.7. Assurance Through Obedience 3.7.1. 1 John 2:3–6 “And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments. Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked.” (1 Jn 2:3–6) The Apostle John reinforces the connection between faith and life transformation, “And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments. Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him,” (1 John 2:3–4). John’s epistle underscores that genuine knowledge of God—saving faith—produces obedience. Faith is not merely an intellectual claim; it is relational and transformative.[17] The moral and spiritual fruit of obedience functions as both evidence and assurance of salvation. Those who claim belief without obedience may lack true faith, a concern that FGT underemphasizes by separating belief from life change. 3.7.2. Romans 1:16–17; 16:25–27 “For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, “The righteous shall live by faith.” (Rom 1:16–17) “Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages but has now been disclosed and through the prophetic writings has been made known to all nations, according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith— to the only wise God be glory forevermore through Jesus Christ! Amen.” (Rom 16:25–27) The Apostle opens Romans with a declaration of the gospel’s surprising power: it is “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes” (Rom 1:16). He immediately adds that “the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, ‘The righteous shall live by faith’” (Rom 1:17).[18] From the outset, Paul emphasizes that salvation is entirely by faith—faith that both saves and sustains the believer’s life. This, he says, is the gospel. When Paul closes the letter, he frames the gospel he has proclaimed from start to finish as producing “the obedience of faith” (Rom 16:25–26). Faith in the gospel inevitably issues in obedience. Where there is no obedience, there is no assurance that saving faith is present. Salvation is by grace through faith, but that faith is living—it produces repentance and grows a life of obedience. 3.8. Recap Across both the Gospels and the Epistles, the biblical witness consistently affirms: 1. Faith and repentance are inseparable — Conversion is one unified act of turning from sin to God and trusting in Christ. 2. The gospel call is holistic — The apostles consistently proclaim repentance toward God and faith in Christ as one response. 3. Saving grace always transforms — The grace that saves also re-creates, energizes, and produces a new life. 4. Works flow from salvation — Good works are the inevitable result of genuine faith, never its cause. 5. Empty profession is exposed — Claims to know God without accompanying change are rejected as false. 6. Obedience gives assurance — A life marked by “the obedience of faith” confirms that grace has been truly received. These passages collectively demonstrate that FGT’s claim—that faith alone, in a purely intellectual or one-time sense, guarantees salvation—does not align with Scripture. Faith is always accompanied by repentance, and this inseparability has been recognized historically as a core component of Christian orthodoxy. 4. Theological Analysis: The Problem of Separating Faith and Repentance 4.1. The Nature of True Faith True saving faith, according to Scripture and historic theology, is both cognitive and relational. It involves knowledge of God’s truth, trust in Christ’s redemptive work, and submission to God’s authority. New Testament scholar Thomas Schreiner synthesizes the church fathers on this, “They gladly affirmed that salvation was of the Lord. They also, in line with the Pauline witness, confessed that salvation was by faith instead of by works. At the same time they concluded that good works were necessary for final salvation. These affirmations need not be seen as contradictory.”[19] In contrast, FGT emphasizes intellectual assent or a singular moment of belief as sufficient for eternal security. By divorcing faith from repentance, FGT misrepresents the biblical nature of faith, creating the possibility of a saving faith that is empty or dead. 4.2. The Risk of False Assurance One of the most significant pastoral dangers posed by FGT is the illusion of guaranteed salvation despite a life devoid of repentance or obedience.20 Individuals may assume they are saved based solely on a historical (even momentary) profession of faith, without any ongoing evidence of spiritual growth or transformation.[21] Scripture repeatedly warns against such superficial faith. Jesus cautions that, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” (Matt 7:21) James similarly emphasizes that faith without works is dead (James 2:26). When faith is divorced from life change, as in FGT, professors[22] are susceptible to false assurance, mistakenly equating mere intellectual assent with salvation. FGT goes so far as to say that those who abandon the faith are still saved! Bob Wilkin and Ken Yates, leaders in FGT said “If someone believed in Jesus for eternal life—even if they later throw away or abandon their faith—they are still saved. Eternal life is eternal.”[23] This has mammoth implications for it communicates to those without communion with Christ (including atheists!) that if they prayed a prayer of salvation sometime in their lives, that they are eternally secure.[24] They communicate to those who deny the gospel (even though they prayed a prayer as a five year old at a VBS, or who profess faith but happily live in an adulterous relationship) that they are saved from God’s wrath.[25] Therefore, their theology in these cases essentially tells people that as long as they meant that prayer at some point in their life, even if they no longer mean it, they are eternally secure. This is possibly the greatest error in the FGT system. 4.3. Powerless Grace Advocates of FGT maintain that saving faith is a simple act of believing in Jesus for eternal life, and that any change in life, while desirable, is not a necessary or inevitable result of that faith. They seek to preserve the freeness of the gospel by keeping repentance—especially in the sense of turning from sin—separate from the condition of salvation. In their view, grace saves apart from repentance (which they call a work), and moral transformation belongs in the realm of discipleship, not justification.[26] While this concern to protect grace from works-righteousness is understandable, it results in a conception of grace that falls short of the biblical witness. In Scripture, grace is not merely God’s favorable disposition toward sinners; it is his active power that rescues, renews, and reorients the heart toward himself (Eph 2:8–10; Titus 2:11–14). By allowing for a form of “salvation” in which the sinner may remain unchanged, the FGT position presents a grace that is cheap because it requires no surrender of the heart, valueless because it produces no true holiness, and powerless because it does not free from sin’s dominion. In this framework, whatever transformation occurs after faith is understood as the result of a believer’s voluntary effort rather than the inevitable fruit of God’s Spirit at work in the repentant believer (Phil 2:12–13). This shifts the decisive cause of holiness from God’s sovereign work to human will. The gospel becomes reduced to a legal transaction that secures a heavenly future but may leave the present life untouched. Scripture, however, portrays grace as saving “completely” (Heb 7:25, NIV)—not only pardoning sin but breaking its power and producing new obedience.[27] Grace that does not transform is not the biblical grace of Christ; it is a diminished substitute that promises the benefits of salvation without delivering the reality. 4.4. Recap Separating faith from repentance creates a theological system that: 1. Misrepresents biblical faith as purely cognitive. 2. Generates false assurance divorced from life transformation. 3. Makes grace powerless to transform lives. Faith and repentance are two sides of the same coin. Faith, while entirely a gift of God’s grace, always results in a life reoriented toward God. Assurance, therefore, is not abstract but observable in the life of the believer, creating both confidence and spiritual accountability. 5. Answering Common FGT Objections While FGT affirms salvation by grace through faith alone, it often resists identifying repentance as an essential aspect of saving faith. Below are common objections and biblical responses. 5.1. Faith alone is the sole requirement for eternal life, and adding repentance makes the gospel a works-based message. FGT insists that requiring repentance as part of the gospel undermines the freeness of grace. They define repentance as a human work incompatible with salvation by grace alone through faith alone. Response: Biblical repentance is not a meritorious work that earns salvation—it is the God-enabled turning of the heart toward Christ in faith. Scripture never presents repentance as something added to faith but as an inseparable aspect of saving faith itself (Acts 20:21; 26:20). Repentance is not about earning God’s favor; it is the Spirit’s gift that accompanies genuine trust in Christ, expressing itself in a turning from sin to God (Acts 11:18; 2 Tim. 2:25–26). To divorce repentance from faith is to redefine both terms in ways foreign to the apostolic gospel. 5.2. Repentance means only a change of mind, not turning from sin. Repentance is merely a change of mind. FGT teaches that metanoia in the New Testament refers to an intellectual acknowledgment of Christ or agreement with the gospel, not a turning from sin. Eternal life depends solely on faith in Christ, and any ethical or behavioral reorientation is considered a separate issue, relevant to discipleship. Response: In the New Testament, metanoia carries more than the sense of a mere change of mind. It describes a reorientation of life toward God and away from sin. Genuine saving faith always includes this turning—trusting Christ is inseparable from turning from sin. Repentance is not an optional add-on or a later stage of discipleship; it is part of what it means to truly believe. 5.3. The Gospel of John, written to bring people to faith, never mentions repentance. FGT appeals to John’s Gospel as the model evangelistic book, noting that it calls people to “believe” nearly 100 times but never once commands them to repent. They conclude that repentance is unnecessary for eternal life. Response: John’s emphasis on believing does not exclude the reality of repentance—it assumes it.[28] Belief, as John presents it, is never mere mental assent but a wholehearted trust that involves coming to the light and abandoning darkness (John 3:19–21). Jesus’ call to be “born again” (John 3:3) entails a radical transformation, which in other biblical contexts is described as repentance. When the Samaritan woman believed, she left her life of sin (John 4:28–29); the healed paralytic is told to “sin no more” (John 5:14); when the man born blind believed, he confessed Christ publicly (John 9:38). Jesus says “Whoever loves his life loses it, and whoever hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life. If anyone serves me, he must follow me…” (John 12:25-26). Jesus essentially says eternal life is connected with change of loves. Love for Jesus replaces love for self. The absence of the explicit term “repentance” does not indicate absence of its reality, just as the absence of the term “faith” in some evangelistic sermons (e.g., Acts 17:30–31) does not remove the necessity of faith. We must not build our doctrine on an argument from silence in a single book but on the plenary teaching of Scripture, which consistently unites repentance and faith in the gospel call (e.g. Luke 24:46–47; Acts 2:38; 17:30–31).[29] 5.4. Calling unbelievers to repent confuses the gospel with discipleship. FGT holds that repentance belongs to the realm of following Jesus after conversion, not to the initial reception of eternal life. They argue that including repentance in the gospel call burdens unbelievers with discipleship demands before they are even saved. Response: Jesus and the apostles made no such separation in their preaching. Christ began his ministry with “Repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15) and told would-be followers to count the cost (Luke 14:25–33). Peter’s Pentecost sermon to unbelievers included the command to “repent” for the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38). The call to turn from sin and self to God in Christ is not an advanced stage of Christian growth—it is the very essence of initial saving faith. Discipleship begins at conversion. 5.5. Linking repentance to faith front-loads the gospel. FGT fears requiring repentance will cause people to think they must reform their life before believing. Response: Biblical repentance is not self-reformation prior to faith; it is the faith-response itself. A sinner does not first make himself worthy—he turns to Christ in the very act of trusting him to save. The prodigal son “came to himself” and returned to the father as he was (Luke 15:17–20). Repentance is not cleaning oneself up to be accepted but fleeing to the only one who can cleanse. 5.6. Repentance is good and necessary but separate from the call to faith. FGT teaches that all people ought to repent, but they restrict repentance to a post-conversion or discipleship category. In their view, repentance relates to fellowship with God, spiritual growth, or avoiding temporal discipline—not to receiving eternal life. The gospel call to unbelievers, they argue, is solely to believe in Jesus for everlasting life, without reference to turning from sin. Response: The apostolic preaching unites repentance and faith in the same gospel call. Paul testified that he proclaimed to “both Jews and Greeks… repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 20:21). Likewise, when addressing unbelievers, he declared that God “commands all people everywhere to repent” in view of the coming judgment (Acts 17:30–31). The New Testament does not present repentance as an optional follow-up to belief but as the heart-orientation of turning to Christ in faith. By separating repentance from the gospel, FGT allows for people to be saved who never repent of their sin. 5.7. Assurance comes only from Christ’s promise, not from fruit. FGT insists that examining works for assurance undermines confidence in Christ alone. Response: Scripture grounds assurance both in Christ’s finished work (objective) and in the Spirit’s fruit in the believer’s life (subjective). John writes, “By this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments” (1 John 2:3). The Apostle Paul tells us that we are to “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling” (Phil 2:12).[30] Also, Christians are called to “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith” (2 Cor 14:5). This is not shifting trust to works but recognizing the Spirit’s transforming presence as evidence of genuine faith. 5.8. Repentance as Part of Salvation Encourages Judgmentalism Tying repentance to salvation risks making Christians judgmental, constantly evaluating whether others are truly saved based on their behavior. This could undermine assurance and make salvation appear dependent on works rather than Christ’s promise of eternal life by faith alone. Response: It is true that Scripture warns against hypocritical judgment with a condemning spirit. Jesus says, “Judge not, that you be not judged” (Matt 7:1). Yet in context, he calls us to remove the log from our own eye “then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matt 7:5). Far from banning all judgment, Jesus commands a righteous kind of judgment that is humble, self-aware, and restorative. Likewise, Paul writes, “For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside” (1 Cor 5:12–13). Repentance plays a key role in this discernment: it is not the ground of salvation, but the fruit of genuine faith. To affirm a profession of faith while ignoring a lifestyle of unrepentance is to confuse grace with license. True grace produces repentance and obedience as its fruit (Titus 2:11–12). Therefore, requiring repentance does not foster judgmentalism but ensures that the church exercises righteous judgment, safeguards its witness, and lovingly affirms the integrity of genuine faith. 6. Defense of Orthodox Free Grace[31] 6.1. Salvation Is Free, Yet Transformative Historic Christianity affirms that salvation is entirely by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone (Eph 2:8–9). This grace is undeserved, unmerited, and freely given by God. However, the grace that saves is never alone. Rather, it transforms the believer, producing repentance, obedience, and sanctification. Titus 2:11–14 states: For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works. Here, grace is described as active and instructive, not passive. God’s gift of salvation is accompanied by training, purifying, and motivating the believer toward holiness. Orthodox soteriology recognizes that faith necessarily includes a turning away from sin and toward God—a turning that is both inward (repentance of heart) and outward (obedience in life). 6.2. Faith and Repentance Are Two Sides of the Same Coin As established in the Biblical Evidence section, passages such as Mark 1:15, Acts 20:21, James 2:14–26, and 1 John 2:3–6 consistently link faith and repentance. 6.3. Biblical and Pastoral Implications 1. Faith and Repentance Are Evidential — Assurance is grounded in God’s promises and confirmed by evidence in the believer’s life (1 John 2:3–6). 2. Transformative Grace Guards Against Legalism and Complacency — Grace is free, but it calls believers to action. It is neither coercive nor passive; it produces repentance and obedience naturally. 3. Pastoral Responsibility — Pastors must encourage both assurance and obedience. FGT’s model risks neglecting the pastoral call to nurture life transformation alongside the free gift of salvation.[32] By maintaining both the freeness of grace and its transformative power, the historic church preserves the biblical gospel in its fullness, while offering true, sustainable assurance to believers. 6.4. Recap Historic soteriology can be summarized as follows: 1. Salvation is free — entirely a work of God’s grace through faith. 2. Faith is always transformative — producing repentance, obedience, and good works. 3. Assurance is rooted in God’s promises and evident in the believer’s life — not in a mere intellectual or historical act of belief. This stands in contrast to FGT, which emphasizes freeness while minimizing the transformative aspects of faith. By integrating both biblical truth and historic orthodoxy, the Christian church safeguards the integrity of the gospel, ensuring that salvation is free, yet never cheap. 7. Pastoral Applications The theological distinctions between FGT and historic orthodoxy have significant implications for pastoral ministry, discipleship, and Christian formation. Understanding these implications ensures that believers are both assured and accountable, reflecting the fullness of God’s grace. 7.1. Preaching the Gospel Pastors must proclaim the gospel in a way that emphasizes both the freeness of salvation and the necessity of faith that transforms. While FGT stresses freeness, historic orthodoxy maintains that true faith cannot exist apart from repentance and life transformation (Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21). Preaching should invite listeners to trust Christ fully, while also turning from sin, illustrating that God’s grace is both free and active. 7.2. Encouraging True Assurance Assurance of salvation is central to the believer’s confidence and spiritual growth. True assurance rests not on a single intellectual act but on God’s promises confirmed in a life of faith and obedience (1 John 2:3–6). Pastors should help believers evaluate their faith by examining evidence of transformation, guiding them away from the false security promoted by FGT. 7.3. Discipleship and Spiritual Formation Discipleship involves nurturing faith that bears fruit. By emphasizing the inseparability of faith and repentance, pastors can cultivate spiritual disciplines, obedience, and holiness. This ensures that grace leads to lifelong growth, not complacency or moral stagnation. 7.4. Evangelism and Clarity Evangelism must convey that salvation is wholly by grace while calling for repentance and trust in Christ. Misrepresenting faith as mere belief, as FGT sometimes does, can lead to confusion or superficial conversions. Historical orthodoxy ensures that the gospel call invites both trust and transformation. 8. Conclusion FGT is a recent reinterpretation of salvation, separating faith from repentance and emphasizing assurance based solely on intellectual belief. While its proponents adopt the language of “free grace,” their theology departs from the historic teaching of the Christian church and the consistent witness of Scripture. The Bible clearly presents faith and repentance as inseparable, with genuine faith producing life transformation, obedience, and evidence of God’s work in the believer’s life (Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21; James 2:14–26; 1 John 2:3–6). Historic orthodoxy affirms that salvation is truly free, yet it is never inactive. God’s grace brings life change, calling believers to turn from sin, trust Christ fully, and bear fruit in obedience. For the pastor, teacher, and church leader, this understanding provides a foundation for preaching, discipleship, and pastoral care that protects believers from false assurance while nurturing a deep, transformative relationship with Christ. God’s grace is free, but it is also powerful—transforming hearts, producing holiness, and securing eternal life. As the church proclaims the gospel faithfully, it must hold in tension the freeness of grace and the necessity of faith that works through love, ensuring that believers are secure, transformed, and growing in Christ.Download this article Footnotes [1] Free Grace Theology will be referred to as FGT for the rest of this paper. [2] Clement of Rome, Letter to the Corinthians, Ch.7, https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1010.htm, accessed 08/18/2025. [3] Ignatius of Antioch, The Epistle of Ignatius to the Smyrnaeans, Ch.5, https://www.catholica.com/epistle-of-ignatius-to-the-smyrnaeans/index.html, accessed 08/18/2025. [4] Justin Martyr, First Apology, Ch.16, https://biblehub.com/library/richardson/early_christian_fathers/the_first_apology_of_justin.htm, accessed 08/18/2025. [5] Tertullian, On Repentance, Ch.9, https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0320.htm, accessed 08/18/2025. [6] Gregory the Great, The Book of Pastoral Rule, III.30, Admonition 31. https://ia902307.us.archive.org/13/items/Elijah_Elisha/St.%20Gregory%20the%20Great%20-%20The%20Book%20of%20the%20Pastoral%20Rule.pdfaccessed 08/18/2025. [7] Martin Luther, Commentary on Galatians (Grand Rapids: Kregel Classics, 1979) 314. [8] Westminster Confession of Faith, Ch. 11, Sec. 2. [9] London Baptist Confession (1689), Ch. 16, Sec. 2. [10] John Wesley, Sermon 35,https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-sermons-of-john-wesley-1872-edition/sermon-35-the-law-established-through-faith-discourse-one/ accessed 08/18/2025. [11] Billy Graham, “Wit & Wisdom: Grace of God,” 12/09/2015, https://billygrahamlibrary.org/wit-wisdom-grace-of-god/ accessed 8/13/2025. Some FGT may argue that this a Calvinist understanding of salvation. Billy Graham is listed here because he was not Calvinist to illustrate that this is the understanding of Evangelical theology. [12] Zane C. Hodges, Absolutely Free! A Biblical Reply to Lordship Salvation (Dallas: Redencion Viva, 1989). [13] See also Wayne A. Grudem, “Free Grace” Theology: 5 Ways It Diminishes the Gospel (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2016). Michael Horton, Christless Christianity: The Alternative Gospel of the American Church (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2008). R. C. Sproul, Faith Alone: The Evangelical Doctrine of Justification (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1995). Thomas R. Schreiner and Ardel B. Caneday, The Race Set Before Us: A Biblical Theology of Perseverance and Assurance (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2001). [14] See Athanasius, On the Incarnation, §5, 9. Augustine, On the Grace of Christ and Original Sin, I.24. Leo the Great, Letter to the Bishop of Aquileia (Letter 1), II.3. [15] All Scripture references are from the ESV unless otherwise stated. Mark 1:15 is representative of other passages in the gospel where Jesus links faith and repentance together. See also: Matt 4:7; Luke 5:32; 11:32; 13:3; 15:3-7, 8-10; 17:34; 24:46-47. [16] According to BDAG (the gold-standard academic Greek lexicon), there are two definitions given for metanoia. The first is “change of mind,” but there are no biblical uses mentioned. The second definition is “feel remorse, repent, be converted.” There are numerous New Testament uses of metanoia fitting this definition attested to. S.v. “μετανοέω,” Arndt, William, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich. in A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. [17] See above James 2:19-20. [18] In Romans 1:17, the phrase “from faith for faith” can be translated as “beginning and ending in faith,” see the footnote in the ESV version. The NIV renders this as “by faith from first to last.” [19] Thomas Schreiner, Faith Alone—The Doctrine of Justification: What the Reformers Taught … and Why It Still Matters (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2015), 23. [20] Zane Hodges, Absolutely Free: A Biblical Reply to Lordship Salvation, 2nd ed. (Corinth, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 1989, 2014) 101. [21] Bob Nyberg, “A History of Free Grace,” (2021), https://www.gracelife.org/resources/grr/?id=31, accessed 08/18/2025. [22] Those who profess faith. [23] Bob Wilkin and Ken Yates, “If You Throw Away or Abandon Your Faith, How Can You Still Be Saved?” 2/7/2023, https://faithalone.org/radio/if-you-throw-away-or-abandon-your-faith-how-can-you-still-be-saved/, accessed 8/14/2025. [24] FGT proponents would also say that such people ought to repent and live for the Lord so that they have eternal rewards in heaven. However, the error here is still grave. [25] There are plenty of Scriptures that warn that those who practice such things will not inherit the Kingdom. See 1 Cor 6:9-10; Gal 5:19-21; Eph 5:5. [26] Hodges, Absolutely Free, 82. [27] The word in Hebrews 7:25 translated as “completely” in the NIV, is translated as “to the uttermost” in the ESV, and “forever” in the NASB. All these senses are carried by the Greek word in this passage. Therefore, to save completely and forever is in view here which has implications for the life of the saved person here and now. For more on this see: David L. Allen, Hebrews, NAC (Nashville: B & H Publishing Group, 2010), 429, and Thomas R. Schreiner, Hebrews, EBTC (Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2021), 233. [28] I am appreciative of Wayne Grudem’s insights here. See Wayne A. Grudem, “Free Grace” Theology: 5 Ways It Diminishes the Gospel (Wheaton: Crossway, 2016), 48-54. [29] Similarly, possibly the most evangelistic book, the book of Acts, never mentions the love of God. If a theology for evangelism were derived strictly from Acts (ignoring the rest of Scripture), then the conclusion (using the logic above with reference to repentance and John’s gospel) would be that the love of God has no part in evangelism. This is further evidence that we must have the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). [30] The gospel beauty of this is found in the following verse “for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure” (Phil 2:13). This means that part of our salvation is to work out what God has worked in. In other words, even our works are God ordained responses to God, but this passage implies that these responses accompany a saving faith. [31] Orthodox is in reference to “right doctrine.” This is not a reference to the Greek or Russian Orthodox Church. [32] A salvation that is separated from the process of being conformed into the image of Christ essentially severs justification from sanctification. In other words, sanctification becomes a second type salvation (or at least a second tier salvation). If salvation is merely about going to heaven, then it begs the question: How is this eternal life? Jesus said “this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3). If eternal life is about knowing the triune God, and knowing him is to be in relationship with him, then how can there be salvation for those who do not walk with him? Such a gospel is both a powerless gospel (because it affects no change) and a Christ-less gospel (because there is no relationship with Christ).